Efficacy of a remote web-based lung ultrasound training for nephrologists and cardiologists: a LUST trial sub-project.

Within the framework of the LUST trial (LUng water by Ultra-Sound guided Treatment to prevent death and cardiovascular events in high-risk end-stage renal disease patients), the European Renal and Cardiovascular Medicine (EURECA-m) working group of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis Transplant Association established a central core lab aimed at training and certifying nephrologists and cardiologists participating in this trial. All participants were trained by an expert trainer with an entirely web-based programme. Thirty nephrologists and 14 cardiologists successfully completed the training. At the end of training, a set of 47 lung ultrasound (US) videos was provided to trainees who were asked to estimate the number of B-lines in each video. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the whole series of 47 videos between each trainee and the expert trainer was high (average 0.81 ± 0.21) and >0.70 in all but five cases. After further training, the five underperforming trainees achieved satisfactory agreement with the expert trainer (average post-retraining ICC 0.74 ± 0.14). The Bland-Altman plot showed virtually no bias (difference between the mean 0.03) and strict 95% limits of agreement lines (-1.52 and 1.45 US B-lines). Only four cases overlapped but did not exceed the same limits. Likewise, the Spearman correlation coefficient applied to the same data series was very high (r = 0.979, P < 0.0001). Nephrologists and cardiologists can be effectively trained to measure lung congestion by an entirely web-based programme. This web-based training programme ensures high-quality standardization of US B-line measurements and represents a simple, costless and effective preparatory step for clinical trials targeting lung congestion.

The Agreement between Auscultation and Lung Ultrasound in Hemodialysis Patients: The LUST Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accumulation of fluid in the lung is the most concerning sequela of volume expansion in patients with ESRD. Lung auscultation is recommended to detect and monitor pulmonary congestion, but its reliability in ESRD is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a subproject of the ongoing Lung Water by Ultra-Sound Guided Treatment to Prevent Death and Cardiovascular Complications in High Risk ESRD Patients with Cardiomyopathy Trial, we compared a lung ultrasound-guided ultrafiltration prescription policy versus standard care in high-risk patients on hemodialysis. The reliability of peripheral edema was tested as well. This study was on the basis of 1106 pre- and postdialysis lung ultrasound studies (in 79 patients) simultaneous with standardized lung auscultation (crackles at the lung bases) and quantification of peripheral edema. RESULTS: Lung congestion by crackles, edema, or a combination thereof poorly reflected the severity of congestion as detected by ultrasound B lines in various analyses, including standard regression analysis weighting for repeated measures in individual patients (shared variance of 12% and 4% for crackles and edema, respectively) and κ-statistics (κ ranging from 0.00 to 0.16). In general, auscultation had very low discriminatory power for the diagnosis of mild (area under the receiver operating curve =0.61), moderate (area under the receiver operating curve =0.65), and severe (area under the receiver operating curve =0.68) lung congestion, and the same was true for peripheral edema (receiver operating curve =0.56 or lower) and the combination of the two physical signs. CONCLUSIONS: Lung crackles, either alone or combined with peripheral edema, very poorly reflect interstitial lung edema in patients with ESRD. These findings reinforce the rationale underlying the Lung Water by Ultra-Sound Guided Treatment to Prevent Death and Cardiovascular Complications in High Risk ESRD Patients with Cardiomyopathy Trial, a trial adopting ultrasound B lines as an instrument to guide interventions aimed at mitigating lung congestion in high-risk patients on hemodialysis.

The relationship between blood pressure and pain.

The relationship between pain and hypertension is potentially of great pathophysiological and clinical interest, but is poorly understood. The perception of acute pain initially plays an adaptive role, which results in the prevention of tissue damage. The consequence of ascending nociception is the recruitment of segmental spinal reflexes through the physiological neuronal connections. In proportion to the magnitude and duration of the stimulus, these spinal reflexes cause the activation of the sympathetic nervous system, which increases peripheral resistances, heart rate, and stroke volume. The response also involves the neuroendocrine system, and, in particular, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, in addition to further activation of the sympathetic system by adrenal glands. However, in proportion to an elevation in resting blood pressure, there is a contemporary and progressive reduction in sensitivity to acute pain, which could result in a tendency to restore arousal levels in the presence of painful stimuli. The pathophysiological pattern is significantly different in the setting of chronic pain, in which the adaptive relationship between blood pressure and pain sensitivity is substantially reversed. The connection between acute or chronic pain and cardiovascular changes is supported observationally, but some of this indirect evidence is confirmed by experimental models and human studies. The pain regulatory process and functional interaction between cardiovascular and pain regulatory systems are briefly reviewed. Various data obtained are described, together with their potential clinical implications.

Cerebral perfusion during intermittent hemodialysis in patients with acute kidney injury and advanced liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) decreases during intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Since cerebral hemodynamics may be impaired in liver cirrhosis (LC), this condition could aggravate cerebral hypoperfusion during HD in patients with AKI. We examined CBF during the first HD session in patients admitted for AKI, with or without LC. METHODS: CBF was examined by measuring middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity (MCAmfv) with transcranial Doppler at baseline and at the end of the first 4-hour HD session in 11 patients with both AKI and LC (median age 69 years, range 40-87, 7 men). Eleven patients with AKI without LC (median age 77 years, range 69-92, 6 men) served as controls. RESULTS: Median net ultrafiltration volume at the end of the HD session was slightly, albeit not significantly, smaller in the patients with LC than in those without (-0.25 kg [range 0.00 to -1.50] vs. -1.00 kg [range 0.00 to -2.00], p = 0.18). At end of HD session, median MCAmfv had decreased by -5.5 cm/s (range -41.3 to 9.9) in the patients with LC, and by -4.5 cm/s (range -11.0 to -2.5) in those without LC (p = 0.79). At end of HD session, the mean MCAmfv of the 2 groups, adjusted for baseline MCAmfv and net ultrafiltration volume, was 25.7 and 21.1 cm/s in AKI patients with and without LC, respectively (difference between groups: 4.6 cm/sec; 95% confidence interval, -3.8 to +13.0). CONCLUSION: In patients with AKI, concomitant LC does not confer greater vulnerability to cerebral hypoperfusion during intermittent HD.

Cerebral blood flow decreases during intermittent hemodialysis in patients with acute kidney injury, but not in patients with end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) may decrease during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) may be more vulnerable to cerebral hypoperfusion than patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), due to concomitant critical illness and hemodynamic instability. METHODS: In this observational, prospective study, we measured mean flow velocity at the level of the middle cerebral artery by transcranial Doppler at the start, after 2 h and at the end of a hemodialysis session in 15 consecutive patients with AKI and critical illness referred to the nephrological intensive care unit of a university hospital and in 12 patients with ESRD on regular treatment thrice weekly, who served as controls. We compared end-dialysis changes from baseline in mean flow velocity between the study groups and examined the correlation between this change and that of other relevant clinical parameters. RESULTS: Mean flow velocity decreased significantly at end-dialysis in the patients with AKI, but not in those with ESRD (P = 0.02). This difference persisted after adjusting for baseline mean flow velocity and net ultrafiltration volume. No significant correlations were found in either group between changes in mean flow velocity and changes in mean blood pressure (AKI: r = -0.27, P = 0.34; ESRD: r = 0.15, P = 0.68), SUN (AKI: r = -0.33, P = 0.25; ESRD: r = 0.06, P = 0.85), plasma HCO(3)(-) (AKI: r = -0.52, P = 0.24; ESRD: r = -0.18, P = 0.59), hematocrit (AKI: r = 0.08, P = 0.71; ESRD: r = -0.19, P = 0.65) or arterial oxygen content (AKI: r = -0.17, P = 0.36; ESRD: r = -0.33, P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that AKI patients may be more vulnerable than ESRD patients to cerebral hypoperfusion during IHD. Our findings do not support a clear-cut role of rapid changes in blood osmolarity, rheological properties or vasoreactivity of the cerebral circulation to O(2) supply in modulating CBF during hemodialysis.

[Loop diuretics: facts and fallacies]. / Usiamo correttamente i diuretici dell'ansa?

Refractory edema is a clinical condition which recognises different etiologies and is characterized by decreased or absent diuretic response before the therapeutic goal is reached. Several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies are used in this setting, and further research is needed in order to optimize drug effectiveness.

Ultrafiltration in heart failure.

Fluid overload is a key pathophysiologic mechanism underlying both the acute decompensation episodes of heart failure and the progression of the syndrome. Moreover, it represents the most important factor responsible for the high readmission rates observed in these patients and is often associated with renal function worsening, which by itself increases mortality risk. In this clinical context, ultrafiltration (UF) has been proposed as an alternative to diuretics to obtain a quicker relief of pulmonary/systemic congestion. This review illustrates technical issues, mechanisms, efficacy, safety, costs, and indications of UF in heart failure. The available evidence does not support the widespread use of UF as a substitute for diuretic therapy. Owing to its operative characteristics, UF cannot be expected to directly influence serum electrolyte levels, azotemia, and acid-base balance, or to remove high-molecular-weight substances (eg, cytokines) in clinically relevant amounts. Ultrafiltration should be used neither as a quicker way to achieve a sort of mechanical diuresis nor as a remedy for an inadequately prescribed and administered diuretic therapy. Instead, it should be reserved to selected patients with advanced heart failure and true diuretic resistance, as part of a more complex strategy aiming at an adequate control of fluid retention.

[Ultrafiltration and hemofiltration in the cardiology unit]. / Ultrafiltrazione ed emofiltrazione nel paziente cardiologico.

The utilization of renal replacement therapies in cardiac patients has received increasing attention in recent years. In fact, isolated ultrafiltration has been proposed in patients with heart failure as a means for rapidly relieving fluid overload while preserving renal function; moreover, periprocedural hemofiltration (HF) has been suggested for radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RCIN) prophylaxis. As a matter of fact fluid overload, with the ensuing systemic and pulmonary congestion, remains a major problem in patients with heart failure, and diuretic resistance is not an uncommon feature in the more advanced stages of the syndrome. In the same way, RCIN is increasingly indicated as a major complication of the use of iodinated contrast media, accounting for a significant number of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury episodes; moreover, it is thought to be associated with short- and long-term adverse effects on patient prognosis and increased economic burden. This article is aimed at reviewing the background of renal replacement therapies in the clinical context of cardiology wards, with special regard to isolated ultrafiltration and HF, as well as the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of these procedures, and their economic impact. From a theoretical point of view, isolated ultrafiltration could have a number of potential heart- and kidney-related advantages if compared to standard therapy (mainly diuretics). However, currently available clinical evidence does not support these concepts for its widespread utilization. Thus, isolated ultrafiltration should be reserved for selected patients with advanced heart failure and diuretic resistance, as part of a more complex strategy devoted to the control of fluid retention. There is currently no sound evidence for routinely recommending periprocedural HF in coronary angiography procedures, even in patients at high risk for RCIN.

Comparison of the effects on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure of valsartan and amlodipine, alone or in combination with a low-dose diuretic, in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (Val-syst Study).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the time-effect profiles of a once-daily administration of valsartan and amlodipine, each given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, in terms of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four elderly outpatients with systolic hypertension received valsartan 80 mg (n=79) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=85) once daily for eight weeks, after which the patients with poorly controlled office BP were up-titrated to valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg once daily. If their office systolic BP was still >140 mmHg after eight weeks at these doses, 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide was added for a further eight weeks. The hourly BP decreases in all of the patients were calculated on the basis of 24-h ambulatory recordings made after the placebo period and at the end of active treatment. The trough/peak ratio and smoothness index were calculated in the responders. RESULTS: Both the valsartan- and amlodipine-based treatments effectively lowered mean 24-h, daytime and night-time systolic ambulatory BP (all p<0.001) without any significant differences between the two regimens. Ambulatory heart rate decreased in the subjects on valsartan and slightly increased in those on amlodipine (the differences in 24-h and daytime heart rate were significant (p=0.008 and 0.002 respectively). Among the 138 responders, the valsartan-based treatment had a greater anti-hypertensive effect during the daytime hours (p=0.02), a difference that was also significant for average 24-h BP (p=0.02). The mean systolic BP trough/peak ratio was 0.56 in the patients on valsartan, and 0.77 in those on amlodipine (NS). The smoothness index was respectively 1.70 and 1.58 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that both the valsartan- and amlodipine-based treatments lead to a similar long-term reduction in 24-h systolic BP. However, in treatment responders, valsartan has a greater anti-hypertensive effect during the daytime.

Combination of lisinopril and nifedipine GITS increases blood pressure control compared with single drugs in essential hypertensive patients.

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of combination therapy using the angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor lisinopril and the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine GITS on the degree and homogeneity of 24-hour blood pressure reduction in essential hypertensive patients. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 51 patients (mean age, 54.4 +/- 9.4 years) with essential hypertension and clinic diastolic blood pressure between 105 and 115 mm Hg were randomized to 4-week treatment with lisinopril (20 mg), nifedipine GITS (30 mg), or their combination according to a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Trough clinic blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were measured at the end of the run-in period and after 4 weeks of treatment. In addition to clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure reduction, the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index, a new measure for the homogeneity of blood pressure reduction, were also calculated. Although both lisinopril and nifedipine GITS produced a significant reduction in clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure values, the reduction obtained with the combination was significantly (P < 0.001) greater. Moreover, the combination therapy increased (P < 0.01) the smoothness index as compared with each single drug for both systolic (lisinopril, 1.02; nifedipine GITS, 1.1; combination, 1.76) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.98; nifedipine GITS, 0.87; combination, 1.54) blood pressure values, whereas trough-to-peak ratio values (expressed as median) for systolic (lisinopril, 0.41; nifedipine GITS, 0.52; combination, 0.55) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.35; nifedipine GITS, 0.40; combination, 0.49) blood pressure values were not significantly increased by the combination therapy. Thus, antihypertensive treatment with the combination of lisinopril and nifedipine GITS is more effective and balanced over the 24 hours than the combination components administered alone, confirming that the smoothness index is superior to the trough-to-peak ratio in assessing homogeneity of pharmacologic blood pressure reduction.

A controlled, prospective study of the effects of atorvastatin on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney diseases, particularly if presenting with significant proteinuria, are commonly associated with substantial alteration of serum lipid levels. Experimental evidence suggests that lipid abnormalities may contribute to the progression of kidney disease. However, studies in humans on the subject are scarce. METHODS: In a prospective, controlled open-label study, the authors have evaluated the effects of one-year treatment with atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, versus no treatment on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease in 56 patients with chronic kidney disease. Before randomization, all patients had already been treated for one year with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) and other antihypertensive drugs. RESULTS: By the end of one-year treatment, urine protein excretion decreased from 2.2 +/- 0.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.0 g every 24 hours (P < 0.01) in patients treated with atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor and ARBs. By contrast, urinary protein excretion decreased only from 2.0 +/- 0.1 to 1.8 +/- 0.1 g every 24 hours (P value not significant) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor or ARBs. During this time, creatinine clearance decreased only slightly and not significantly (from 51 +/- 1.8 to 49.8 +/- 1.7) in patients treated with atorvastatin. By contrast, during the same period of observation, creatinine clearance decreased from 50 +/- 1.9 to 44.2 +/- 1.6 mL/min (P < 0.01) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that treatment with atorvastatin in addition to a regimen with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may reduce proteinuria and the rate of progression of kidney disease in patients with chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, and hypercholesterolemia. The benefits appear to occur in addition to those of treatment with ACE inhibitor and ARBs.